Focal length 35mm equivalent, but not F-stop?

Started Jul 24, 2014 | Discussions thread
Chikoo
OP Chikoo Senior Member • Posts: 1,630
Re: Focal length 35mm equivalent, but not F-stop?

Beachcomber Joe wrote:

Chikoo wrote:

Beachcomber Joe wrote:

Because it is not necessary.

Says who?

The f stop of lenses has always been marketed and thought of as an indicator of its light gathering ability, not its depth of field. This is why we refer to lenses with wide apertures as fast, not shallow. That ability does not magically change with format. In the heyday of film and until recently in digital, photographers were ISO restricted in low light conditions. The difference of a stop of light gathering ability was a significant reason to pay the premium in cost, weight and size for a fast lens. That is how most fast lenses have been marketed and the primary reason those lenses are purchased. In many cases the shallower depth of field of the faster lens was looked upon as a negative.

That was then. You got to change with the times.

Why? Large format shooters have managed for years without f/stop equivalents. FF and APS-C don't need them. The only people to whom it seems to matter are MFT users. They are, they tell us, so much smarter and cleverer than the rest of us. That being the case I'm sure they have an app to figure it out themselves and don't need published figures.

Maybe they never needed them because practice told them which lens works best with their camera, and then they stick to it. Another reason why it is difficult for those to change systems because they are do not know how it will work with other cameras/formats.

Now if this was made simpler, it would be simpler for photographers to switch systems without being a first grade mathematician first.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
tko
tko
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow