1Ds is a joke

ROFL Talk about words putting an image in your mind. You really might need a faster camera than the 1Ds to capture all the action that would follow that statement!
This DOES go both ways, but if I walk into a
biker bar, I dont exactly pipe up with 'bikers are gay' and then
hope that my remarks are met with 'reasonable discussion' it just
doesn't wash!
--
John
 
I bought the camera for landscape work -- it performed beautifully.
I then moved into more action oriented work, and it failed
miserabily. I should have gotten the 1D for this line of work, but
honestly at that point I was too frustrated to care. Decided to
sell all my equipment for someone else to enjoy.
Winners never quit and quitters never win!!

--
Photography is light!
 
I didn't read the whole thread - following these 100+ thread is such a waste of time! - but I did read some of Roark's replies.

He's obviously not a troll. 1Ds hasn't satisfied his needs and he expressed his opinion, that's all.

But anyone saying bad things about Canon equipment and good things about Nikon is going to receive a rude reception in this forum, even he's telling the truth. Oh well... Life is tough ;)

Take it easy, everyone. Live and let live.

--
Mishkin
 
and not mine ?? .... weird, especially as you actually OWNED a D1X - Heck we've all seen a picture of you holding the noisy old tractor!

--
Please ignore the Typos, I'm the world's worst Typist

The No1 Dedicated 1D forum in the UK -------->

http://www.1dforum.co.uk/php/phpBB2/

 
......and bought the wrong camera - read my reply Mish .. Sorta sums the whole affair up as I see it anyway.

--
Please ignore the Typos, I'm the world's worst Typist

The No1 Dedicated 1D forum in the UK -------->

http://www.1dforum.co.uk/php/phpBB2/

 
I didn't read the whole thread - following these 100+ thread is
such a waste of time! - but I did read some of Roark's replies.

He's obviously not a troll. 1Ds hasn't satisfied his needs and he
expressed his opinion, that's all.

But anyone saying bad things about Canon equipment and good things
about Nikon is going to receive a rude reception in this forum,
even he's telling the truth. Oh well... Life is tough ;)

Take it easy, everyone. Live and let live.

--
Mishkin
--



http://www.pbase.com/domotang
 
He may not be a troll, but he does have a serious problem. Would anyone in his right mind go on a Canon forum and bash the finest camera Canon has ever produced?

It is one thing to express your concerns but it is quite another to use the kind of verbage he did and in the process insult everyone who owns a 1Ds. He is effectively calling everyone who owns this camera a total idiot!

Ah well, I have nothing to worry about, I only have a 10D...... :)))
Are you enjoying all the attention Rourke? ;-)

Jack
I didn't read the whole thread - following these 100+ thread is
such a waste of time! - but I did read some of Roark's replies.

He's obviously not a troll. 1Ds hasn't satisfied his needs and he
expressed his opinion, that's all.

But anyone saying bad things about Canon equipment and good things
about Nikon is going to receive a rude reception in this forum,
even he's telling the truth. Oh well... Life is tough ;)

Take it easy, everyone. Live and let live.

--
Mishkin
 
Your post is packed with a lot of reasoning and useful info. I don't understand those who just insult others.

Your posts make people think and see other sides of things they didn't consider before. Canon should give you a "Canon Most Valued Professional" title, as Microsoft does to people who help others a lot with MS products in public forums.
......and bought the wrong camera - read my reply Mish .. Sorta
sums the whole affair up as I see it anyway.

--
Please ignore the Typos, I'm the world's worst Typist

The No1 Dedicated 1D forum in the UK -------->

http://www.1dforum.co.uk/php/phpBB2/

--
Mishkin
 
Your posts make people think and see other sides of things they
didn't consider before. Canon should give you a "Canon Most Valued
Professional" title, as Microsoft does to people who help others a
lot with MS products in public forums.
Thanks Mish - I can Smell a real troll a mile off (most own Fuji S2s ;-) jk) - I'd be happy if Canon just gave us poor UK dudes the same deal they give the USA instead of gouging us.. USA Web prices + VAT would do me fine..

$720 US Dollars for the 20-35USM - I mean, Sheesh! ......... :(

--
Please ignore the Typos, I'm the world's worst Typist

The No1 Dedicated 1D forum in the UK -------->

http://www.1dforum.co.uk/php/phpBB2/

 
Please no monday morning quarterbacking. :) It's easy to see he is not a troll after reading his replies a day later. The fact is, his first post was very troll-like and definitely flamebait. Not to mention he just signed up to the forum a few hours before. All three of his threads he started were against DPR rules. Started a for sale thread, cross posted it, then flamebaited with this one which was one of those posts that you say "Oh Boy! This is gonna be trouble!"
I didn't read the whole thread - following these 100+ thread is
such a waste of time! - but I did read some of Roark's replies.

He's obviously not a troll. 1Ds hasn't satisfied his needs and he
expressed his opinion, that's all.

But anyone saying bad things about Canon equipment and good things
about Nikon is going to receive a rude reception in this forum,
even he's telling the truth. Oh well... Life is tough ;)

Take it easy, everyone. Live and let live.

--
Mishkin
--
Jim

'cause life is a lesson – you learn it when you’re through' - LB
 
I agree, these UK prices are a compete rip off. How about visiting NYC, buying lenses from B&H, and coming back with lenses in carry-on luggage? And you can ship lens boxes and foam inserts by mail from NY to G.B.

Is it viable?

If you ever be to NYC, be my guest!!!!!!!
Your posts make people think and see other sides of things they
didn't consider before. Canon should give you a "Canon Most Valued
Professional" title, as Microsoft does to people who help others a
lot with MS products in public forums.
Thanks Mish - I can Smell a real troll a mile off (most own Fuji
S2s ;-) jk) - I'd be happy if Canon just gave us poor UK dudes the
same deal they give the USA instead of gouging us.. USA Web prices
+ VAT would do me fine..

$720 US Dollars for the 20-35USM - I mean, Sheesh! ......... :(

--
Please ignore the Typos, I'm the world's worst Typist

The No1 Dedicated 1D forum in the UK -------->

http://www.1dforum.co.uk/php/phpBB2/

--
Mishkin
 
or, to be generous - perhaps you had a real lemon. I'm a working pro photojournalist/documentary who shoots much action, often under horrible light. I have been more than pleased with my 1ds, which more than paid for itself months ago. When the max ISO of 1250 is not enough, I have found I can underexpose by up to two stops and still pull out a photograph that beats what I could have done with high speed (3200) film.
If I decide to review my pics, I have to wait until the buffer is
completely flushed to even look at them.
What a bummer. In order to review your pix on the D1x, you not only
have to wait for the buffer to clear, you also have to take it out
of shooting and into playback mode, which is a hassle and requires
manipulation with both hands. 2:1 for Canon now.
I know you're trolling or just speaking about things which you
haven't a clue.

This is true with the Nikon D1, but with the D1H and the D1X, you
no longer have to wait for the buffer to finish and you certainly
DO NOT have to put the camera in "playback" mode; you merely hit
the DISPLAY button at any point in time and you can review your
images.

If you can't get the basics right, I won't bother with anything
else you had to say.

I also prefer the ISO 1600 images from the D1H compared to the ISO
1250 images from the 1Ds. The 1Ds is just chaos of red and green
blotches at 100% zoom. The D1H is just a chaos of white speckles
and smaller, less noticable blotches.

The 1Ds is in no way worth $8000 unless you have the cashflow to
pay for itself very quickly.

I bought the camera for landscape work -- it performed beautifully.
I then moved into more action oriented work, and it failed
miserabily. I should have gotten the 1D for this line of work, but
honestly at that point I was too frustrated to care. Decided to
sell all my equipment for someone else to enjoy.
 
Not worth it if just getting a 17-40L etc - we get ripped off with air fares too ;-0

--
Please ignore the Typos, I'm the world's worst Typist

The No1 Dedicated 1D forum in the UK -------->

http://www.1dforum.co.uk/php/phpBB2/

 
Hum,

maybe the wrong choice of words Roark!? Calling the camera piece of sh*t and a joke will not get you much approval from this forum. I do believe that this was not the right camera for you. The points you made about it regarding the boot time, review time are not bogus, they are real as it seems. but the way you went about telling people this is maybe overly harsh.

I know how you fell though, buying such an espensive piece of hardware and for it to not perform up to your standards is dissapointing. I understand your frustration. But coming in here and telling people that the camera is a piece of sh8t wont win you any friends.

Maybe next time go at it a bit more mellow, explain your toughts, initiate a discussion about what you dislike, maybe people will help you overcome the limitations, or maybe not, but at least, people will surely be willing to help.

Dont forget, telling all these people this camera is no good, is like insulting them a bit, mostly the ones who bought it. Most of them probably made the best choice for them, so it's not a joke or a piece of sh*t to them, its one of the best tools they have.....think about it.

take care

--
Joel
G2 galleries: http://www.pbase.com/joels/powershot_g2
D60 galleries: http://www.pbase.com/joels/d60

'A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.'
 
A bad craftsman always blames his tools.

So are you telling us a lie... or did you just lie to your E-Bay customer.

Hope he doesn't read these forums... for your sake.

If you told us a lie... shame on you.

If you told your E-bay customer a lie...... get a lawyer.... he can take you to court.... especially since you said here that it's a bad camera here. If he reads your words here.... guess what... you just lost a court case. In some states it's triple damages in small claims court. Pucker up.

If it is indeed a bad camera... why didn't you contact Canon.... if it is indeed a bad camera.... why did you misrepresent the camea to some poor schmuck on E-Bay?

Let me guess.............
Just sold my Canon 1Ds.

It was a joke.

The AF was the pits. Sure, it was "fast," but far from accurate -
especially in AI SERVO mode. I was taking pictures of my gf
bowling and she was rarely in focus. The AF was continually
jumping in and out of focus, and I kept the AF sensor on her at all
times.

The operational is a joke as well. I turn on the camera, and
depending on how many pics is on the CF card, it takes about 1-2
seconds to become usable.

If I decide to review my pics, I have to wait until the buffer is
completely flushed to even look at them.

The overall usability speed of the camera was no better than the 10D.

The three-finger ISO change is a joke as well.

I'm sorry but the Nikon D1 series has the Canon 1D and 1Ds beat in
the usability area.

Just for good measure, the 1Ds had outstanding colour and
resolution that the Nikon could never touch (at the time of this
article.)

I'm very familiar with the Canons and Nikons. This isn't a human
error thing.

I feel that the Nikon AF system is better as far as keeping the
subject in focus and not losing it all the time and trying to
readjust.

I also felt that the high ISO images from the 1Ds were a joke as
well. When you zoom in 100% all I would see is blotches of red and
green. Even at ISO 400 this was prevelant.

Sorry to bash the 1Ds so much, but for $8000 this camera is a piece
of s* .

Compare that to a Nikon D1X which has instant operation speed, from
viewing files, to turning on, to deleting and has a better AF
system - I don't even know why I bothered buying the 1Ds.

No, this isn't a troll.
--
Ron

http://users.qconline.com/~starship/eagles/

http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=4906
 
He's clearly had a hard enough time already. Folks, Roark is frustrated, but he's not insulting anyone. There's no reason to be nasty to him. If you think he's a troll, ignore him or reason with him. Leave the hot ammo in the box. I don't think he's a troll, though, just overheated.

Roark, some of your points are valid. But, it's the hot rhetoric, dismissive attitude, and overly broad conclusions that are making it hard for people to accept what you're saying. Ya gotta cool off before you start typing. Also, a lot of us are probably jealous, first that you could afford the camera, and second that you could afford to ditch it. Some of us, myself included, and in full knowledge of its limitations, would give our eye teeth to have that camera. That's not gonna make a lot of folks sympathetic when you go off on a rant.

It sounds to me like you just didn't do enough research before purchasing or testing immediately after purchasing. The issues you describe could have been discovered on the day of purchase, and the camera could have been returned for a refund. It shouldn't have been such a big deal.

Sorry it was such a traumatic experience for you. I went through the same thing with some bad lenses. Returned 'em within 14 days for a full refund. I wish you better luck next time.
I'm sorry to hear you were so disappointed with your 1Ds.

The personal insults launched against you by the people above are
deplorable.

Neil Thomas
--
'May we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion.' -
Dwight D. Eisenhower
 
The ebay ad didn't sound misrepresentative. All he said is it was in near perfect condition - which is to say almost like new. This is more or a wear and tear thing than a testimony to its capabilities. You just like scaring people with lawyer talk or what? Get real loser.
So are you telling us a lie... or did you just lie to your E-Bay
customer.

Hope he doesn't read these forums... for your sake.

If you told us a lie... shame on you.

If you told your E-bay customer a lie...... get a lawyer.... he can
take you to court.... especially since you said here that it's a
bad camera here. If he reads your words here.... guess what... you
just lost a court case. In some states it's triple damages in
small claims court. Pucker up.

If it is indeed a bad camera... why didn't you contact Canon.... if
it is indeed a bad camera.... why did you misrepresent the camea to
some poor schmuck on E-Bay?

Let me guess.............
Just sold my Canon 1Ds.

It was a joke.

The AF was the pits. Sure, it was "fast," but far from accurate -
especially in AI SERVO mode. I was taking pictures of my gf
bowling and she was rarely in focus. The AF was continually
jumping in and out of focus, and I kept the AF sensor on her at all
times.

The operational is a joke as well. I turn on the camera, and
depending on how many pics is on the CF card, it takes about 1-2
seconds to become usable.

If I decide to review my pics, I have to wait until the buffer is
completely flushed to even look at them.

The overall usability speed of the camera was no better than the 10D.

The three-finger ISO change is a joke as well.

I'm sorry but the Nikon D1 series has the Canon 1D and 1Ds beat in
the usability area.

Just for good measure, the 1Ds had outstanding colour and
resolution that the Nikon could never touch (at the time of this
article.)

I'm very familiar with the Canons and Nikons. This isn't a human
error thing.

I feel that the Nikon AF system is better as far as keeping the
subject in focus and not losing it all the time and trying to
readjust.

I also felt that the high ISO images from the 1Ds were a joke as
well. When you zoom in 100% all I would see is blotches of red and
green. Even at ISO 400 this was prevelant.

Sorry to bash the 1Ds so much, but for $8000 this camera is a piece
of s* .

Compare that to a Nikon D1X which has instant operation speed, from
viewing files, to turning on, to deleting and has a better AF
system - I don't even know why I bothered buying the 1Ds.

No, this isn't a troll.
--
Ron

http://users.qconline.com/~starship/eagles/

http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=4906
--
--
http://www.pbase.com/mroda
 
Has the following ever occured to any of you who requent this forum:

That lots of people who are contemplate the purchase of a camera come into these forums first to get some feedback from people who have used that camera...and that someone who comes in here with negative comments about a camera may be doing so NOT to be a troll as you so love to label him but maybe because he is being honest and maybe, just maybe he feels he is helping someone else not make the same mistake he made?

Perhaps phrases like piece of are a bit strong but for crying out loud, give the guy a break! Why must people always gloss over what they feel is not up to the standards they had hoped for. Would you all have been happier had he come in here after having a bad experience with an $8000 purchase and told everyone how wonderful the camera is? Why not just take the criticism of the camera and live with it? It's his opinion. If yours differs fine then. But leave the poor guy alone and stop berating him just for giving his honest impression of the thing!
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top