Focal length 35mm equivalent, but not F-stop?

Started Jul 24, 2014 | Discussions thread
AlbertTheLazy
AlbertTheLazy Veteran Member • Posts: 8,132
Re: Focal length 35mm equivalent, but not F-stop?
1

EinsteinsGhost wrote:

Beachcomber Joe wrote:

Because it is not necessary. The f stop of lenses has always been marketed and thought of as an indicator of its light gathering ability, not its depth of field. This is why we refer to lenses with wide apertures as fast, not shallow. That ability does not magically change with format. In the heyday of film and until recently in digital, photographers were ISO restricted in low light conditions. The difference of a stop of light gathering ability was a significant reason to pay the premium in cost, weight and size for a fast lens. That is how most fast lenses have been marketed and the primary reason those lenses are purchased. In many cases the shallower depth of field of the faster lens was looked upon as a negative.

Amen!

Hallelujah!

Extra comment: the small number of people who are interested in 'equivalence' in the DoF/noise way are usually perfectly capable of working out their arcane calculations for themselves. Angle of view equivalence ('APS-C 35mm = FF 50mm' type stuff) is meaningful for the great unwashed wanting to buy a travel zoom. All the rest would just confuse them.

-- hide signature --

Albert
Every photograph is an abstraction from reality.
Most people are more interested in the picture than the image.

 AlbertTheLazy's gear list:AlbertTheLazy's gear list
Canon PowerShot G15 Fujifilm X-T1 Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 APO DG Macro Fujifilm XF 18mm F2 R Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R +4 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
tko
tko
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow