Sel 50mm 1.8 Oss vs Fe 55mm 1.8

Started Jul 21, 2014 | Discussions thread
OP pixee Regular Member • Posts: 410
Re: Sel 50mm 1.8 Oss vs Fe 55mm 1.8

philip pj wrote:

It will depend on what 'much better' means to you, and what usage and aperture range you want. Let's look at the FE55 alongside two Nikkors of around the same focal length, the 50/1.8G and 50/1.4G to assist the decision (and to illustrate some other things for interested readers).

50s tend to be regarded as all rounders but the OOF quality and overall 'sharpness' are definite yardstick measures. Much better than a summary number such as DxO is the spread of performance across the frame at particular apertures. I like slrgear charts for this reason and it so happens they have tested all three of these lenses.


You can't really expect even performance wide open on a planar subject to tell you much about resolution as your image at this aperture will be typically dominated by out-of-focus data, so quality of bokeh assumes much greater performance.

While it's not true that all lenses are equally good at f8 this is the best each generally can give for overall performance, if corner definition matters. To assess performance at one aperture for sharpness f5.6 is a good choice, but we must be aware of the rate of improvement on stop down from f2 to f5.6, because often you want very good results without surrendering more than a stop or so from wide open. Lets look at how these fare at f2, just one third - one stop down from open.

Nikkor 50mm f1.8G:

On a 24Mp sensor, this one has very uneven performance, up to 4 blur units = poor corners and substandard drawing of subject matter. Might have QC problems, I hope so.

Nikkor 50mm f1.4G:

On a 24Mp sensor also, a very centre-focused image with very poor corners, 3-4 blur units, fast drop-off of performance from the very small centre.

Sony 55mm f1.8:

On a 36Mp sensor - much tougher test! - very even and very good performance across the frame, very little loss of contrast/resolution from mid-frame to far corners. around 2 blur units.

Since it delivers superior results even with a challenging 36Mp sensor, on a 24Mp a7 the FE55 would be extremely good at f2. As you see above, it is still no contest with the two Nikkors. BTW, it is even worse for the $1700 Nikon 58mm f1.4, a supposedly refined 'bokeh' lens that is much less 'sharp'.

[You may wonder why lens review sites choose to test Sony lenses on the toughest test in full frame - the a7r - yet test Nikon's and Canon's lenses on five year old camera bodies, a far easier test of lens performance.]

The step up from 20-24Mp to 36Mp is exactly why lens makers are rushing to update designs, as we see with the Sigma ART 50mm f1.4. Unsuitable on the a7 cameras for other reasons - bulk and weight - that lens is almost double the weight of the a7r!

Thank you!

I agree. I have Nikon d800 and Df and Sony A7 and can compare all Nikon lenses side by side with A7. As you know Nikon d800 shares the same sensor with A7r. Sigma 35 1.4 and Nikon 85mm G 1.8 are among best as DXo Mark has stated, but how much "better" is Zeiss 55mm 1.8 in A7? Maybe not at all better, but I will test them together.
It is true that the new 50mm G 1.8 was not scored as high as Zeiss 55 Fe. I am happy with Zeiss 35mm FE with A7, and even happier with Sigma 35mm 1.4 and Nikon 85mm G 1.8 with Nikon d800 and DF bodies.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow