Another look at equivalence
Sensor size determines equivalence generically, but I was curious about how specific cameras compare to my new RX100m3, so I did some calculations, based on DxOMark sensor tests. DOF differences are pretty much determined by sensor size, but noise performance and IQ can also vary based on technology and megapixels.
DxOMark gives each camera a low-light ISO score, which they define as "the highest ISO setting for a camera that allows it to achieve an SNR of 30dB while keeping a good dynamic range of 9 EVs and a color depth of 18bits."
Using the formula log2(higher ISO/lower ISO) = stops difference, I calculated the number of stops difference for specific cameras compared to the RX100m3. I then used How Many Stops to determine the approximate apertures that those cameras would require to match the RX100m3's f/1.8 at 24mm and its 2.8 at 70mm. Here are my results:
- Panasonic LX7 - f/1 and f/1.5
- Olympus OM-D E-M1 - f/2.2 and f/3.5
- Pentax K5II - f/2.8 and f/4.4
- Nikon D800 - f/4.3 and f/6.7
Obviously, you can put faster lenses on the Micro Four Thirds, APS-C, and FF camera, but with kit lenses, only the FF camera will do better than the Sony.
Take this for what it's worth, and if you believe that my results are incorrect, or that they don't make sense for some reason, I won't take offense. I had some time on my hands this morning and thought this would be fun to do.
Leave it in the ground!
|Post (hide subjects)||Posted by||When|
|Jul 22, 2014|
|Jul 23, 2014|
|Jul 26, 2014|
|Jul 24, 2014|
|Jul 25, 2014|