What's wrong with the Quattro

Started Jul 18, 2014 | Discussions thread
D Cox Forum Pro • Posts: 16,573
Re: What's wrong with the Quattro
1

maple wrote:

Agree with Kendall. Nothing's wrong with Q's, just different.

P has finer details with smoother tonal transition. M has greater micro contrast that makes distant subjects look being closer, thus more vivid, though not necessarily natural.

It seems that both images could benefit from finer sharpening. 1 pixel at 100% seems a lot, for Q and M. But I'm no expert in pp.

I'm not convinced that Foveon images need any sharpening at all.

 D Cox's gear list:D Cox's gear list
Sigma sd Quattro H
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow