Corner tests for 16-35 f/4 vs. 16-35 f/2.8 (v.1) vs. 24-70 f/2.8L II

Started Jul 4, 2014 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Abu Mahendra Senior Member • Posts: 4,014
Re: Corner tests for 16-35 f/4 vs. 16-35 f/2.8 (v.1) vs. 24-70 f/2.8L II

"There's also a bit of field curvature at 35mm but it's not really dramatic."
- Photozone review of the Canon EF 16-35mm f/4 L IS USM

No mention of substantial FC, or of FC at focal lenghths other than 35mm.

-- hide signature --

"That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."

The onus of the evidence is on the one making the claim, not on the one questioning the claim.

 Abu Mahendra's gear list:Abu Mahendra's gear list
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM +4 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
dil
dil
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow