Corner tests for 16-35 f/4 vs. 16-35 f/2.8 (v.1) vs. 24-70 f/2.8L II

Started Jul 4, 2014 | Discussions thread
Rick Knepper
Rick Knepper Forum Pro • Posts: 15,689
Re: Corner tests for 16-35 f/4 vs. 16-35 f/2.8 (v.1) vs. 24-70 f/2.8L II

Mongrel wrote:

Good 'ole DPreview where even the best attempts to be helpful by real live professional photographers are subject to the sarcasm, criticism, rants and raves of amateurs!


Craig, thanks for the time you took to put this up. Certainly offers enough proof of Canons improvements in their wide-angle zooms. Nice portfolio as well...

Is amateur intended to be an insult? LOL dude.

Being a professional photographer has nothing to do with being observant, experienced and well-written unless you are those things independently. All of us are professionals in other fields and we can spot professional demeanor and treatment of the subject matter a mile away - talking about you, Mongrel, right this minute. Mr. hotdog's characterization of the 24-70 II was wrong and he admitted to misspeaking. Why are you characterizing my comments (or any others for that matter) as criticisms, rants, raves or sarcasm?

-- hide signature --

Rick Knepper, photographer, shooting for pleasure. It is better to have It and not need It than need It and not have It. Various RAW comparisons at Link below. Includes 5D3 vs D800E (new uploads), 5D3 vs. 6D, Zeiss lenses etc.

 Rick Knepper's gear list:Rick Knepper's gear list
Pentax 645Z Canon EOS 5DS R Fujifilm GFX 50S Pentax smc D FA 645 55mm F2.8 AL (IF) SDM AW Pentax DA645 28-45mm F4.5 +8 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow