Corner tests for 16-35 f/4 vs. 16-35 f/2.8 (v.1) vs. 24-70 f/2.8L II

Started Jul 4, 2014 | Discussions thread
hotdog321
OP hotdog321 Forum Pro • Posts: 19,354
Re: Corner tests for 16-35 f/4 vs. 16-35 f/2.8 (v.1) vs. 24-70 f/2.8L II

fritzli wrote:

great news. thanks for taking the time for testing and posting here. i ordered one and cant wait.

Yeah, it's a pain to do tests like these, but they were a real eye-opener. The 16-35mm focal lengths are key for photojournalism, architecture, landscapes, street photography, even office portraits when used properly. Canon deserves some kudos for producing a truly sharp wide angle zoom at an affordable price.

 hotdog321's gear list:hotdog321's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
dil
dil
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow