Nikon 70-300 VR vs Nikon 70-200 f/4 VR

Started Feb 28, 2013 | Discussions thread
theJrod Regular Member • Posts: 209
Re: Nikon 70-300 VR vs Nikon 70-200 f/4 VR

JurassicPizza wrote:

. It makes me want Nikon to make a 24-70 f/4 of comparable quality (better than the 24-120), because the 2.8 is such a beast of a lens!

Yes to this! The 2.8s are a bit too much for me in price and weight, but an updated F4 "trinity" would be awesome.

I considered the 70-300 (both Nikon and tamron) before settling on the 70-200/4. It's amazing. I had the 2.8 VRII for a short time before the AF went out, and I don't miss it.

 theJrod's gear list:theJrod's gear list
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/4G ED VR Nikon D750 Nikon AF-S Teleconverter TC-14E II Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G +1 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow