When the Canon 1" sensor?

Started Jun 19, 2014 | Discussions thread
BarnET Veteran Member • Posts: 3,534
Re: When the Canon 1" sensor?

crashpc wrote:

BarnET wrote:

crashpc wrote

This was new mount, and the adapter was there. What´s different with pathetic Sony jumping mounts every odd day? How was MFT at the start when they needed union to survive? Shooting Olympus lens on Panasonic is not laughable?

Both systems made a proper lens system within a few years. Canon still has a very very weak native lens lineup. Using only lenses on Panasonic isn't laughable as everything works. Just like when mounting superior sigma glass on your canon.

I believe all STM lenses are native. All other are not. The mount does not change much. USM and other lenses behave poorly on M bodies.

The 1200d worst DSLR in the passed 3 years.

Well, maybe. It is cheapest DSLR around, so it´s supposed to be the worst, and it wipes floor with other cams for current price (Image quality wise). You just don´t see. That´s cool, but your laugh is not that cool then....

It was not the cheapest DSLR.... You could buy an older camera with vastly superior specs for less money. Even from. Canon themselves. The 600d. Besides canon IQ is nothing special. The 18mp is noisy and has less dynamic range as the competition. Look at the k500 vs 1200d same price but the k 500 is feature set is between the 700d and 70d.

Well, you can have 5D I or II for few bucks. We are talking about new camras, right? K500 might be better cam for better money. Well, it´s just ONE. That does not mean Canon is laughable. If second place is laughable for you, then we have very different measure.

Well the Sony a58 Nikon d5100- d3200 Pentax kr k500 k30 and then the canon 600d and 100d too. Basicly it doesn't matter what you will buy you will always gain something somewhere else

The elph 340hs with an F7 lens on a 1/2.3 inch sensor.
Try to calculate the equiv. dof on that lens!

Cheap small cam with great zoom. What does it have to do with equivalence? Look at Sony compact cams image output. They might have more reach, more resolution, brighter glass, but they still fail against Canon in image quality department, and of course it´s not $160 or what..

I am sorry but this is simply wrong. The lens of the canon is so slow that you have no resolution to speak of at the long end. Few new camera's are worse then their predecessor. This is and by a fair margin.

Did you see Sony HX superzooms? The recent HX60V looks okay. Older brothers are (times more expensive and still very poor quality) out.

Sony also makes the RX series. There only few good superzooms. And the canon sx isn't one of them

Total mess. Maybe we could dig for some reviews. Techradar has it for Sony, maybe there can be some for Canon. I believe it´s not laughable compared to other companies.

Checkout the pcmag.com review of the 340hs.

They have also done the 1200d.

-- hide signature --

Why does he do it?

 BarnET's gear list:BarnET's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow