RX100 III - MFNR vs. median stacking

Started Jun 20, 2014 | Discussions thread
Flat view
Rick Evertsz
Rick Evertsz Regular Member • Posts: 267
RX100 III - MFNR vs. median stacking

I've been quite impressed with the multi-frame noise reduction (MFNR) implementation on the RX100. On the Mark 1, output looked nice at ISO 3200; not so nice at 6400. The Mark 3 seems about a stop better to me, i.e. I'm happy with its output at 6400.

Out of curiosity, I just did a quick comparison between MFNR and median stacking at ISO 12800, explained here: http://petapixel.com/2013/05/29/a-look-at-reducing-noise-in-photographs-using-median-blending/

This is a very informal comparison, but it's convinced me to use median stacking if forced to shoot at ISO 12800 in an environment where there is minimal subject movement. In this example, I stacked JPEGs because DXO Optics Pro (my RAW converter) doesn't yet handle RX100 III RAW files. High ISO NR was set to LOW for all shots. I was sitting in bed shooting handheld, so the pictures aren't perfectly aligned. All shots were 24mm, f1.8, 1/100s.

Hope these 100% crops are of interest to someone

Single shot JPEG

Multi-frame noise reduction (in camera)

Median stacking (combined using 10 JPEGs in Photoshop)

 Rick Evertsz's gear list:Rick Evertsz's gear list
Sony RX100 III Sony Alpha a7S Sony FE 55mm F1.8 Sony FE 24-70mm F4 OSS Sony FE 70-200 F4
Sony RX100 Sony RX100 III
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
Flat view
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow