Some new infos about dp2Q from the touch and try event. + JPEG samples from Yodobashi and MapCamera

Started Jun 19, 2014 | Discussions thread
PrebenR Veteran Member • Posts: 3,529
Re: noise is still not convincing, but the lens is

Usee wrote:

PrebenR wrote:

The photos indicate at least one stop improvement in low light. you know the real sensitivity of the DP2Q in comparison to the DP2M?

You know, that it could be, that the photos which are marked as ISO 800, could also be ISO 400: long as the sensitivity issue is not clear, like it is even in this case: long it is really not more than a indication...

...and I have seen the indication, that the DP2M ISO is close to the true ISO,

but the DP2Q ISO is not...

Based on what, gut feeling? Get real.

...Fuji and Olympus were AFAIK first in showing a noise improvement, mainly based on different ISO numbers and not on actual improvements:

So what does that have to do with Sigma. Olympus is even convicted of major fraud., we still have to wait for the final conclusions.

This from the guy who constantly draws conclusions?!!!!

-- hide signature --

Lightwriting with Sigma
Ā«Bad reputationĀ»

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow