x100s vs x100

Started Jun 8, 2014 | Discussions thread
Les Lammers
Les Lammers Veteran Member • Posts: 3,508
Re: quite a question

AllanRinggaard wrote:

Les Lammers, let me ask you something. When you say there is no controversy in raw processing with the X100, does this mean that you get easier, faster, and better FUJI looking images when you shoot with your Bayer X100 vs the Xtrans XE1? What's your opinion on this?

I made a little test here

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3681117#forum-post-53806917

My conclusion to our answer is, if you use Adobe products, you will get "easier / better" results with the X100 than the X-trans sensor.

To sum it up, the X-trans sensor rocks, but not with lightroom. Lightroom rocks, but not with X-trans.

For X-trans i will use other rawconverters, for Bayer i will continue to use adobe products. I hope, that adobe, will get better with time, so i can continue with the same workflow, that i know and are happy with.

I agree. Adobe may have done more with the X-Trans if it were in Canikon. Personally, I think I will purchase Capture One Express for RAW as it is on sale for $49.

 Les Lammers's gear list:Les Lammers's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix X100 Fujifilm X10 Fujifilm X-Pro1 Fujifilm X-E1 Fujifilm X-T2 +6 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow