The Economist article on mirrorless cameras

Started Jun 7, 2014 | Discussions thread
Dandrewk Senior Member • Posts: 1,094
Re: The Economist article on mirrorless cameras

JonTafferOfPhotography wrote:

Dandrewk wrote:

Zeisschen wrote:

A niche, yes, maybe in the American market. They forgot however, that America is not the center of the photography world.

I am pretty sure that in 5-10 years we will look at DSLR as the transition technology between analogue and digital photography. Some collectors or oldies might still use them, like the rangefinder manual focus Leicas today, but the market will be 95% mirrorless. Why? Because in 2013 and 2014 the Mirrorless could catch up in terms of viewfinder, sensor size and finally AF speed.

The Canikon DSLR systems are alomst technically obsolete, even more with the next generation of mirrorless to come. Lens systems of mirrorless systems are grown up and already almost serve all needs of professional photographers. Nobody needs 200 lenses in a system any more in a world, where zoom lenses are almost as good as primes and speed can be compensated by incredible high ISO capability of modern sensors. The average user still only has the kit lens + maybe a 50mm and a wide angle.

My last I sentence:

Canon and Nikon better play the mirrorless game serious, their DSLR systems might be niche and obsolete in less than 5 years.

I totally agree. Canon and Nikon will be seen as lens makers who still manufacture a few dinosaur DSLRs for the die-hards. They better get their mirrorless acts together, because Sony is already 1+ generations ahead.

when canikon finally make their full frame mirrorless move, I think all others will be left in the dust.

primarily including sony.

that said, I think we are several years (3-8 years or more) away from mirrorless cameras that perform (viewfinder/AF) in low light like a DSLR.

That is almost verbatim what was said regarding Apple when they introduced the iPhone.  "Just wait until BlackBerry does the same, it will be all over".

If Sony continues its technological edge over its rivals, it will continue to be the market leader in this segment.  As time goes by, that becomes more and more locked into reality.  How many former Canon/Nikon users are now Sony users?  How about people new to photography?  How likely would they start with a Sony mirrorless and then go to DSLRs?

Regarding your last paragraph, that "several years" is already here.  I guess you haven't been paying attention.  The A7/r is already the equal of it's DSLR rivals in low light performance.  The A7s blasts them clear out of the water.  An EVF has it all over DSLR in low light compositions.  And the $600 a6000 -outperforms- Nikon's flagship DSLR in autofocus.

The future is already here.  Nikon and Canon are squarely behind the curve.

 Dandrewk's gear list:Dandrewk's gear list
Sony RX1R II Sony Alpha a7R II Sony FE 55mm F1.8 Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS Sony FE 90mm F2.8 macro +7 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow