Image quality. How much better A99 than A900?

Started May 31, 2014 | Questions thread
realgeek Senior Member • Posts: 1,394
Re: Image quality. How much better A99 than A900?

Febs wrote:

Reading your post I think that the difference in our opinion comes from the fact that I'm not going over 3200 ISO and in the 1600-3200 range there's not much difference between the 2 cameras, less than 1 stop methinks.

Above 3200 the A900 becomes unusable whereas the A99 can be pushed further with the appropriate noise reduction applied.

Personally I don't feel comfortable using the A99 at ISO 6400 and since I don't do sports photography I also don't really have to, but I understand your point.

I was going to offer up a similar explanation.  It really only is at the very high end that the difference is so pronounced.

 realgeek's gear list:realgeek's gear list
Nikon D500 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-300mm F3.5-6.3G ED VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-80mm F2.8-4E ED VR Nikon 200-500mm F5.6E ED VR Tokina AT-X Pro 100mm f/2.8 Macro +3 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow