DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

X100 Raynox 250 (NR0) vs X-A1 16-50mm (NR-2)

Started Jun 1, 2014 | Discussions thread
OP Bx100 Regular Member • Posts: 218
Re: X100 Raynox 250 (NR0) vs X-A1 16-50mm (NR-2)

averageguy wrote:

Al Valentino wrote:

Thanks. I used to own a Canon 500D close-up filter, which I rarely used in lieu of my macro lens. Anyway, same concept as it also only worked closeup but most of the time I manually focused. Some Fuji lenses are a nightmare to manually focus, like the 35mm, and some are a please, like the 14mm. I ask because although I have a macro that I love for the Fuji system I have been eyeing the Raynox 250 as something smaller to keep in the bag, just in case. The macro only goes outside when I know it will be used, like a botanical flower garden, or a butterfly exhibit

I to am eyeing this...do I need any adaptor to fit it to the 27mm

TIA

Some other members also using Raynox 250 with 27mm, try to read this:

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3639558#forum-post-53356641

Cheers

 Bx100's gear list:Bx100's gear list
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5 Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 Fujifilm FinePix X100 Canon EOS 500D Fujifilm X-A1 +6 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow