DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

100-300 vs. 50-200+1.4TC: surprised!

Started Jun 1, 2014 | Discussions thread
luisflorit
OP luisflorit Veteran Member • Posts: 8,514
Re: 100-300 vs. 50-200+1.4TC: surprised!

Anders W wrote:

PS: some of the arguments here in my thread remembered me why I left the forum, that you asked me the other day...

Well, you still have to wear a pretty thick skin at times. But I think the reason for some of the reactions is that your claims are simply a bit provocative in view of what at least some people consider established facts.

You are probably right, but how can a claim about *MY* lenses be an "established fact"  for some folks here?

Anyway, I didn't expect anyone  to compare an uncooked RAW with an Oly processed JPG of a completely different subject taken miles away. I really don't have time to argue in those terms.  I'm glad I didn't write  the word "equivalence"!!

Exactly how provocative something is can be a bit difficult to judge if you haven't been around here for a while.

I expected the opposite reaction, since I was praising m43rds, like some folks had.

L.

-- hide signature --
 luisflorit's gear list:luisflorit's gear list
Olympus E-M1 II Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 Pro Olympus M.Zuiko 300mm F4 IS Pro Venus Laowa 7.5mm F2 MFT Olympus E-M1 +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow