Canon 135 F2L - the best wedding portrait lens ?

Al Downie wrote:

andrewdaviesphotography wrote:

BAK wrote:

>> one longer prime to replace the 70-200 mainly for wedding portraits and engagement shoot / outdoor portraits.<<

A 135 remains a lousy replacement for a 70-200 for wedding portraits and engagement shoot/outdoor portraits, taken by a professional photographer at wedding after wedding, in a desire to satisfy a variety of clients under a variety of circumstances, professionally.

Perhaps a well-written original post would have been handy. Something along the lines of, >What are the chances my clients and I would b e pleased with pictures from a 135 f2 when I have the time and space and shooting circumstances to use a fixed focal length lens, often outdoors.?<<

And then experienced photographers could have told you what a wonderful lens the 135 f2 is, when used under restricted circumstances.

BAK

In simple terms the 135 F2 equals if not surpasses the 70-200 F2.8 II for sharpness and has the extra advantage of F2 lower price and less weight , within a few simple footsteps to compensate it can take the same shots but better. No one was ever talking about using it in restricted areas thats why i have other lenses and bodies. After all i am an experienced professional.

The only restriction in photography is imagination, its a shame you dont have one.

Well said! Some people will never be able to work without the crutch that zoom lenses provide, and they'll always be blind to the compromises that zoom lenses also provide. There's a place for them of course, but the vast majority use them for 'framing' (as opposed to composing) without moving, which just completely lacks imagination.

Also backed up by a quick view of your fantastic work on flickr Al - very nice

Wedding and Landscape Photography by Andrew Davies