Do you still need prime lenses if you have the Olympus 12-40/2.8?

Started May 20, 2014 | Discussions thread
Flat view
rgs_45 Senior Member • Posts: 1,039
Do you still need prime lenses if you have the Olympus 12-40/2.8?

I'm trying to decide if I still would need primes if I get the 12-40/2.8. I was considering the following lenses:

  • Olympus 12/2.0, 17/1.8, 45/1.8 for landscape, portrait and other general photography.

I have been researching and reading all the information, articles and reviews regarding the Olympus 12-40/2.8 and nothing but praise on how sharp the lens is open wide and throughout the zoom range. I can save some money just getting the 12-40/2.8 instead of 3 prime lenses. I can get a second body from the savings on just getting

So back to my question: Do you still need prime lenses when you have the Olympus 12-40/2.8?

BTW, the lens will be used on a EM-5 body.


 rgs_45's gear list:rgs_45's gear list
Olympus E-M1 Olympus E-M5 II Panasonic GX850 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8 Olympus M.Zuiko ED 75-300mm 1:4.8-6.7 II +5 more
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow