Dedicated video DSLR scenario
So... 1080p resolution is roughly a 2mp image, right? Would you buy a DSLR with an APSC (or FF) sensor but which only has a 2mp image capability? Obviously, the pixels would be ENORMOUS (huge plus), but there's no pixel binning or line skipping to worry about, or their inherent weaknesses.
I could be wrong so please correct me if I'm am but, wouldn't this produce dramatically better results? Or is there some physics-based deficiency I'm unaware of?
To me, this would be intriguing with DPAF and at about $600. Especially at SL1 size but add on a little size for the articulating screen.
What about a 4K resolution (8-ish megapixels) DSLR for those who insist 4k is necessary right now?
- Fujifilm X-T223.6%
- Nikon D50025.4%
- Nikon AF-S 105mm F1.4E8.2%
- Olympus M.Zuiko 12-100mm F47.5%
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-G857.2%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art6.7%
- Sigma 50-100mm F1.8 Art5.1%
- Sony a63006.4%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III3.7%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V6.3%
|Lighthouse, Bottom of the World by CelticOdyssey|
from An A to Z of Subjects- Week 12, L
|Dundrum by Rik Powdrill|