Nikkor 17-70mm f/2.8
That would make me skip two lenses, and be back on a two-lens setup!
But now I'm being told, it would be impossible to make such a lens? I have a 17-35mm and 35-70mm, why can't they be "melted" together as one? Should only be same size or slightly bigger than the 17-35???
I then triumphfantly pointed out, there's an ARRI 16-85mm T2.6, but he then only commented about the 5 kg weight and $28.000 price tag...
So, the question is... is it possible to calculate, how big such a lens would be?
The nice ARRI...
Wish Nikon would something like that. Only smaller, cheaper and lighter...
- Fujifilm X-T223.6%
- Nikon D50025.4%
- Nikon AF-S 105mm F1.4E8.2%
- Olympus M.Zuiko 12-100mm F47.5%
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-G857.2%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art6.7%
- Sigma 50-100mm F1.8 Art5.1%
- Sony a63006.4%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III3.7%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V6.3%
|INFERNO by Milmor Fotografias|
from Get to Work (Power Tools)
|Love my present! by eyahaled|
from Holiday reactions