Do you believe that some Canon lenses have the resolution ...

Started Apr 27, 2014 | Discussions thread
OP Silverback1988 Contributing Member • Posts: 706
That shows that the lens is worth more than that pixel density.

qianp2k wrote:

Of course 36mp > 21mp to have more resolution.

True.

I don't know if there such a worst lens that isn't worth to use it above 5DII's pixel density.

If such a lens is exist, then it's little (or zero) benefit to use 36 MP sensor over the 21 MP one.

So I think max resolution is a combination between sensor resolution and lens resolution.

Of course other factors could affect the resolution : camera shake, focus, diffraction, etc.

Though 12 MP is already plenty for most application (or situation), for most people.

I am using G1X (not the mark II) myself, and I believe its max resolution is less than 12 MP.
But I know that you are not in the most people category,

and that's a compliment, Peter.

I know that you are stitching, I consider you are not satisfy with current camera's resolution can give you, at least not in one shot picture.

-
Brian

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow