Full Frame Offensive

Started Apr 16, 2014 | Discussions thread
Great Bustard Forum Pro • Posts: 41,324
Re: OT:

Silverback46 wrote:

Great Bustard wrote:

Silverback46 wrote:

Hey GB

Have you been shooting with the 70D?

Just the 6D.

Curious what your thoughts on the output of this camera.

Looks very good -- like every other camera out there today.

As for the SHG I think they are special but you may have to define what 'special' means!

I think the SHG lenses are nothing less than outstanding. The problem as I see it, however, is that they go exactly counter to the premise behind a smaller sensor system -- small and light. In contrast, many "special" lenses have come out for mFT that do not run contrary this premise.

Recall this post of mine from long ago:

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/36149406

Uncanny how similar it is to how mFT is going, don't you think? Well, since Canon doesn't listen to me:

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/53523578

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/53521273

it's nice to know that maybe Olympus does.

Thanks for replying GB. I thought maybe you had explored the 70D. As a buyer for large purchases it ticks a lot of boxes for the type of work we do. I have been able to play with some of the Canons lately and I was pleasantly surprised. It's always nice to ask people shooting them who would give an honest opinion.

Well, check out this thread on the EM1 vs 7D:

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/53512400

I know the 7D is not the 70D, but, to be honest, an EM1 system looks pretty effing "pro" to me.

I agree completely with you on the current cameras...they are all very good. Some of our specific needs limit the cameras we can look at. As for the lenses I was just poking you for using the word 'special'. I do know what you mean. They are excellent lenses and special for me since I don't have any! I do have some of the primes though for m4/3rds and they are outstanding for a small travel cam when I switch from my Sonys.

In the Canon forums, I have been involved in more than one discussion about Sigma's new line of "Art" lenses vs Canon's new IS primes. While I have opted for the faster and optically superior Sigma primes, I have a strong interest in Canon's smaller and lighter primes that are still optically outstanding and come with IS. In fact, I just got berated for saying that I feel that Canon's IS primes would suit more people than Sigma's "Art" primes:

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/53528630

In other words, I feel that my personal choices represent the minority, not the majority.  So, when it comes to FF vs smaller formats, I almost always recommend the smaller formats.  In my opinion, while the IQ differential between mFT, APS-C, and FF is most certainly there, they are all playing at a level "high enough" that the primary concern for the majority should be operation rather than IQ.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
tko
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow