Inconsistent aperture rings

Started Apr 2, 2014 | Discussions thread
Albert Valentino Veteran Member • Posts: 6,135
Re: Inconsistent aperture rings
1

jyhfeei wrote:

Al Valentino wrote:

Cartwheels MD wrote:

27 is too small. Zooms are variable aperture.

Yes. But the question remains, why are there no aperture markings on the 10-24 f/4 zoom which is a constant aperture lens?

I heard that this was due to cost. The target price for this expensive-to-make lens was $1000 and the fact that this image stabilized zoom lens did not have to be reengineered with a marked aperture ring was a factor.

The high end, constant aperture, weather sealed zooms coming will have reengineered, marked aperture rings. And heftier prices to boot.

I bet you are correct, cost. This is sad as the aperture ring is one of features I love. Also, since Fuji apertures tend to move easily it is easier to notice. I have the 14mm and will stick with that, especially sine it does not need software to correct for the distortions

-- hide signature --

Fuji Silver XE1 w/14, 35, 18-55, 55-200, Rokinon 8mm Fisheye & Tamron 90mm f/2.8 Macro

 Albert Valentino's gear list:Albert Valentino's gear list
Olympus E-M1 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6 Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di Macro Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R Samyang 7.5mm F3.5 UMC Fisheye MFT +11 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
jfw
jfw
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow