Why not a 12-35 F1.8 - F2.8?

Started Apr 2, 2014 | Discussions thread
s_grins Forum Pro • Posts: 11,972
Re: Why not a 12-35 F1.8 - F2.8?

superstar905 wrote:

If Sony can make a 28-70 at the equivalent aperture as noted in the subject, why can't we have one for a M43s lens? I mean, the 12-35 is a constant F2.8, but if you compare to the Zeiss offering being the same size as the Panny zoom, I don't see why not......

I guess you want this lens because SONY users can get it.

Question 1   Do you have 2.8/12-35?

Question 2  How much did you pay for 2.8/12-35?

Question 3  Are you ready to spend 3 times more for your piece of mind?

Question 4  How many lens shoppers are going buy this lens @ particular price point?

P.S. Please do not tell me that Zeiss is not expensive, and piece does not have to be Zeiss, thus it can cost less.

-- hide signature --

Camera in bag tends to stay in bag...

 s_grins's gear list:s_grins's gear list
Panasonic G85 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Sigma 30mm F2.8 EX DN Sigma 60mm F2.8 DN Art Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-140mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH. / Power O.I.S +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow