OMD EM1 or Fuji XT1.. getting around noise issue on m 4/3 ?

Started Mar 26, 2014 | Discussions thread
Aethon Regular Member • Posts: 319
Re: Oh, really?
1

Aethon wrote:

dgrogers wrote:

It is a fact that Fuji has excessive noise reduction.

This is not a fact. (Excessive noise reduction would show lack of detail. There is none)

There is a reason people say skin on shots from Fuji looks like plastic.

This is not a fact. (this applies to a very specific use-case: high-ISO JPGs only. ISOs lower than about 5000 aren't affected, nor are RAWs. It doesn't apply to the OP's situation)

Let's not forget about the water color effect that often crops up either.

This is not a fact. (this complaint was pretty much obsolescent a year ago)

If you think rendering that looks like it was painted by water color and plastic skin is detail, you're smoking some good stuff.

I own both m43 and Fuji. I know your signature says you're infatuated with your Olympus, but really there's no reason to post misinformation.

The issues I mention are well documented.

Fuji Watercolor

Fuji Plastic Skin

Do I need to post a link for noise reduction during raw conversion?

-- hide signature --

Completely infatuated with the "OMG"

If you actually read my responses instead of posting knee-jerk silliness you would see that I didn't deny there had been discussions around these issues, only that your description of them was misleading.
Again, why post misinformation? Olympus and Fujifilm both make great cameras. Why get your knickers in a twist?

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
GBC
SGA
GBC
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow