"ISO 25600 but not intentionally!" revisited
A week ago I started the thread ""ISO 25600 but not intentionally!" to show how I tried to handle two pictures that got overISOed accidentially.
Link here: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/53314536
Now I tried again to process the pictures with DxO Optics Pro 9 and I think I reached a point where the results are not great but usable. Have a look:
For me this means that one can go higher than, let's say ISO 3200, that has been my peak number with older bodies like E-30 or E-5.
|Nectar Dancing by Lensmate|
from A Big Year - birds
|Foggy morning by LassiM|
|Sad clown by PEB|
|Mtl Gen X 2015 DP by MarioSS|
from - Gen X - (In Full Colours+ Border)