Sony A6000 already outdated by Nikon v3...........

Started Mar 13, 2014 | Discussions thread
Helena777
Helena777 Forum Member • Posts: 95
Re: Sony A6000 already outdated by Nikon v3...........

Aspenz wrote:

Helena777 wrote:

z36qc wrote:

This is the link
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2014/03/13/nikon-1-v3-offers-improved-af-system-and-faster-continuous-shooting

What's do you think of it?

I think that Sony have done a game-changer, achieving that a APS-C mirrorless have the same blazing fast AF than DLSR (in reality, MORE fast). Sony have achieved to give us, consumers, a valuable succesor to NEX 6-7, without the MAIN DRAWBACK of the mirrorless: slow AF. And that for +- 800$.

Still waits to seen by more users just how fast it is, any of the 1 cameras can already replace the job of a dslr for sporting event and the likes. It's about time anyway that you people get a decent AF.

There is plenty of videos showing that game-changer blazing fast AF in a APSC sensor. Replace a DSLR with a 1 is too much optimistic. Errrr You have fast AF and burst rate, now it's about time anyway that you people get a proper camera in all others features XD

Nikon has continued its "1" saga, and again, the price starts on a subrrealistic figure. A mediocre camera with some stellar features, with a price tag full of "badge stupidity", like Canon EOS-M had, like first "1" had.

┬┐Somebody said "sensor size"? They are in different leagues.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/helena123/sets

It may be priced slightly higher but I immediately pre-ordered on the day itself just on the fact quite nothing will get me the continued joy of using N1 cameras.

And as for sensor size, the N1 does a job decent enough for me, I mean, if people were all after the best high iso IQ for sensor size everyone should pick up a Fuji-X-- camera or a D4. There are many factors other than that and the N1 cameras are a very good balance of what a camera system should be.

The opinions on the net (included mine) should not be a threat for you enjoying of 1. Enjoy great!

Read yourself...: there are many factors other than AF and burst rate. MANY and IMPORTANT others.

The 1 being a rounded camera...? Copy & Paste here: "jewelry price for a mass market camera with a 1" sensor, with no DMF, with the most awkward menus and options seen in the digital era, with a mediocre kit lens, with a even more mediocre cheap version of the kit lens, with a super zoom that seems designed for APSC in bulk that carry a APSC price tag; with a AF that is promoted as stellar for social photography but when you use the camera the default speed is 1/30!!!"

Simply don't come here to "vendernos la moto" of 1 being better than any NEX. That is not polite, that is ridiculous and this isn't true.

 Helena777's gear list:Helena777's gear list
Sony Alpha NEX-5 Sony Alpha NEX-3 Sony Alpha NEX-7 NEX-5T Pentax K-S1 +5 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
FEJ
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow