Advice for portrait lenses

Started Mar 14, 2014 | Discussions thread
OP sapralot Junior Member • Posts: 37
Re: Advice for portrait lenses

Stacey_K wrote:

sapralot wrote:

Or am I getting something wrong? So the 50 f/1.4 is still on my shortlist. (Would the 55 f/1.2 make sense?)

and the bokeh sometimes looks rather busy.

This "sometimes busy" bokeh is why I'm no fan of the nikon 50's (the 1.4 and 1.8 models). It's hard to tell when it's going to rear it's ugly head and ruin a shot. I can see the 50 being useful but the current nikon 50's just are iffy in the regard.

Options are the 58 (expensive) or the 60mm f2.8. I'm waiting to see how good the new sigma is myself. Yes it's likely big and heavy but sometimes sacrifices have to be made somewhere and I'd rather not make them on image quality unless I have to.

Hi Stacey,

Thanks a lot for your feedback!

Do you mean "busy" in the following sense?

Granted, it is somewhat less than perfect. But I won't spend > EUR 1.700 for a 50mm lens... And the 60mm isn't very fast.

What about the older 50mm lenses from Nikon?


Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow