Is the 12-40mm good enough to forego 12mm, 17mm, 25mm and 45mm primes?

Started Mar 13, 2014 | Questions thread
OP rickreyn Senior Member • Posts: 1,437
Re: Some blur

I went back and looked at a lot of my shots, and I had an acceptable amount of blur. Like others have mentioned, when I used the 50mm 1.8 on the Canon, I'd get the nose in focus and the rest of the child pleasingly blurry! That's not what I intended. More like, the swing set blurry and the child's head in focus. While its easy for this to happen with the Canon setup, it take more finesse to work DOF with MFT.

-- hide signature --
 rickreyn's gear list:rickreyn's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus E-M1 Panasonic Lumix G 14mm F2.5 ASPH Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 +8 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow