The 'discriminatory-nature' of capture-date stipulations!

Started Mar 11, 2014 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
tasad Contributing Member • Posts: 502
Re: The 'discriminatory-nature' of capture-date stipulations!
1

xml6000 wrote:

Falsely 'discrediting' me by suggesting I manipulate EXIF data  (...)

In this challenge entries should be taken after 19th February , 2012 :

http://www.dpreview.com/challenges/Entry.aspx?ID=590619

Your entry was "taken" on 28th February , 2012 :

...

Exif data viewer shows , that it was taken on 15th August, 2010 :

...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/notts_photos/5936478773/in/photostream/

In this challenge entries should be taken after 28th February , 2012 :

http://www.dpreview.com/challenges/Entry.aspx?ID=593137

Your entry was "taken" on 28th February , 2012 :

...

Exif data viewer shows , that the image was taken on 5th June , 2011 :

...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/notts_photos/5800962178/in/photostream/

In this challenge entries should be taken  after 24th February , 2012 :

http://www.dpreview.com/challenges/Entry.aspx?ID=590662

Your entry was "taken" on 1th March , 2012 :

...

Exif data has been removed from the entry , but the information under the image on your Flickr account shows , that it was taken  on 10th June , 2011 :

http://www.flickr.com/photos/notts_photos/5818020852/in/photostream/

...

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
tko
tko
tko
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow