The 'discriminatory-nature' of capture-date stipulations!

Started Mar 11, 2014 | Discussions thread
shortchord Regular Member • Posts: 255
Re: The 'discriminatory-nature' of capture-date stipulations!

xml6000 wrote:

shortchord wrote:

xml6000 wrote:

billythek wrote:

You take great pride in being a cheating low life scum. I give you credit for that.
- Bill

Refusing photographic entries on the basis of 'date-capture' cheats the wider photographic community - and has a faint whiff of cloaked-censorship about it.

Oh, please. This could be true only if there were no way to display a photograph here other than a date-restricted challenge. That is clearly not the case, as there are various other ways to display photographs here which have no date restrictions, including the large majority of other challenges.

Yes, - but that's 'a given' that there are plenty of other challenge slots - which isn't the debate - so what is your point?

If there are ample opportunities to display a particular photograph -- and you acknowledge that there are -- then the community is not being "cheated" of the opportunity to view that photograph.

 shortchord's gear list:shortchord's gear list
Sony SLT-A57 Sony a77 II Sony a99 II Tamron AF 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Sony DT 50mm F1.8 SAM +5 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow