New Olympus 17mm 1.8

Started Mar 7, 2014 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Pixnat2
Pixnat2 Veteran Member • Posts: 4,177
To each his own Anders

Anders W wrote:

Pixnat2 wrote:

FrankS009 wrote:

What do you mean by "field qualities?"

I mean the ease of use or "snapinness" in real life shooting.

Yes, but what more specifically is "ease of use" or "snappiness". I don't have the 17 but I have quite a few other MFT lenses to compare my 20 with (e.g., 12/2, 14/2.5, 45/1.8, and 75/1.8 plus a bunch of zooms) and I don't find that the 20 is inferior to any of them with regard to "field qualities" or ease of use. The AF of the 20 is worse under certain conditions but that doesn't trouble me. In ordinary AF-S use, it works just as well/fast as any other lens. Optically, it is clearly ahead of the 17, which of course shouldn't be taken to mean that the latter is bad.

Fine, to each is own Anders.

Both are excellent lenses and have their own qualities.

I had both, I kept one based on my personal preferences and use. Many have done the same (sold the 20 and kept the 17). It must be that the 17mm is sort of attractive, despite being a bit less sharp in the center than the 20.

-- hide signature --

Cheers,
Frederic
http://azurphoto.com/

 Pixnat2's gear list:Pixnat2's gear list
Olympus PEN E-P1 Fujifilm X-E2 Fujifilm X-T1 Nikon D750 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR +12 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow