There is no magical size/weight advantage

Started Mar 5, 2014 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
olyflyer
olyflyer Forum Pro • Posts: 23,930
Re: But there is an optical size and weight advantage!

Photo Pete wrote:

The only thing that the designer of the CX 70-300 couldn't make significantly smaller than the FX 70-300 would be the front element diameter.

I guess you mean the rear element, not the front. The front element is dependent on the aperture, the rear on the sensor size.

Weight, main lens diameter and even length could be made less if required due to the smaller light cones required within the lens to cover the smaller sensor. Whether Nikon choose to do so is another matter.

The idea that length is not affected by being able to deal with narrower light cones is a fallacy.

The length is affected by the shorter flange back distance.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
(unknown member)
IVN
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
(unknown member)
IVN
(unknown member)
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
tko
tko
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow