Nikkor 105 f/2?
I am considering the Nikkor 105 f/2. I have a 50mm and 85 both f/1.8. Best lenses for IQ that I have. I have the trinity lenses but somehow despite their convenience I like shooting with the primes. Not only is IQ better but they require a little more thought to get the composition right.
I'm thinking about adding the 105mm f/2. It is not on sale and is $1000+ but even used ones are in the $800 range so they are highly thought of even used.
My shooting is general. I shoot anything and everything so it wouldn't necessarily be for portraiture. Most of my best work is shallow DOF stuff. I love that and I read the 105 is great for it. Of course it has the DF ring so even better. Does the DF-ring effect still work well if the subject or focus distance is further away, say, 50' away?
Things that concern me are the built in hood and the screw-drive focus. It's an old design. How much does it matter that SWM or AF-S is not used? Is this a dinosaur? I've had a screw-type before (Tamron) and it was pretty loud and grindy sounding.
And with the hood how big is this lens really in practical use? Reviews say it's heavy and well-built. How would it compare to the 24-70mm f2.8 or even the 70-200mm f/2.8? The former is okay but the latter is too much for any amount of handheld use.
It's really the only lens I can think of buying. I wouldn't mind having a 200~400mm for sports or maybe a 35mm primes but don't really see them as something I need.
Thoughts, suggestions on the 105mm are appreciated.
- Fujifilm X-T223.6%
- Nikon D50025.4%
- Nikon AF-S 105mm F1.4E8.2%
- Olympus M.Zuiko 12-100mm F47.5%
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-G857.2%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art6.7%
- Sigma 50-100mm F1.8 Art5.1%
- Sony a63006.4%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III3.7%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V6.3%
|winterblues by richmot|
from Best Landscape 2016
|Cold morning by Kaappo|
from A Winter Wonderland
|The Rock. by SpartanWarrior|
from Sea colors