70D Dynamic Range is actually great, despite what DXOMark says

Started Jan 21, 2014 | Discussions thread
Just another Canon shooter
Just another Canon shooter Veteran Member • Posts: 4,691
Re: 70D Dynamic Range is actually great, despite what DXOMark says

TTMartin wrote:

carlk wrote:

IBIS is really not a must have for me. However I'm also at lost to explain why the companies don't want to add it in the camera even if it means they might sell a few cameras with it. The cynical explanation is they could sell more IS with each lenses but I don't think that's the reason. The unstabilized VF wouldn't be a problem for EVF os that should not be the reason either. My best guess is there are still some technical challenges to match the performance of the in lens IS for these larger sensors.

According to Nikon its not just the viewfinder.

Why is 'in-lens' VR [image stabilization] superior to 'in-camera' VR [image stabilization]?

I think that the right question is why IBIS is superior to no stabilization at all. IBIS is not necessarily and alternative to in-lens IS, it can easily complement it for non-IS lenses.

 Just another Canon shooter's gear list:Just another Canon shooter's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Canon EF 35mm F1.4L USM Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Canon EF 135mm F2L USM +4 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow