35mm equivalent not good for portrait ?

Started Mar 5, 2014 | Discussions thread
DarnGoodPhotos Senior Member • Posts: 6,711
Re: 35mm equivalent not good for portrait ?
1

Bouddha wrote:

I did that and am fine with the 35mm equivalent.

honestly other than out of focus background, I don't really see the difference with my 85mm 1.8.

also I find the 35mm f2 brings enough isolation but still keeps the possibility to understand the environment in which it was taken, which I find IMHO cool.

There is another difference.

Getting close enough for the head to fill the frame will cause distortion (bigger eyes and nose) on the 35mm that won't be there on the 85mm just because you aren't physically as close to the subject.

 DarnGoodPhotos's gear list:DarnGoodPhotos's gear list
Canon G7 X II Fujifilm X-Pro1 Fujifilm X-Pro2 Fujifilm XF 18mm F2 R Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R +4 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
rjx
rjx
rjx
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow