quality of the review samples
I have been away from this forum for a while and wanted to see samples from the reviews to be able to compare the modern camera with the latest technologies to see what I have been missing in the last 4-5 years. I have to admit, with all due respect, the images are mostly mediocre and do not help to evaluate the quality of the images. I am not talking about the "pixel peeping" but to look at images overall quality.
Don't really know what the reason is, but, the images are mostly useless.
This is meant not as a criticism. I am asking for the images to help in evaluation of the cameras and lenses. The specs are not sufficient, and the most of the reviews is concentrated on the technical details, forgetting that the photography is about the images and not numbers.
- Fujifilm X-T223.6%
- Nikon D50025.4%
- Nikon AF-S 105mm F1.4E8.2%
- Olympus M.Zuiko 12-100mm F47.5%
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-G857.2%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art6.7%
- Sigma 50-100mm F1.8 Art5.1%
- Sony a63006.4%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III3.7%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V6.3%
|Kingfisher by cjf2|
from An A to Z of Subjects- Week 11, K
|Bull Rider Being Launched by RBFresno|
from FX bodies and very high ISO