Why is the 42.5 F/1.2 $1600 when the Fuji 56mm F/1.2 is only $1000?

Started Mar 2, 2014 | Discussions thread
Cafe Racer Regular Member • Posts: 277
Re: Why is the 42.5 F/1.2 $1600 when the Fuji 56mm F/1.2 is only $1000?

The LEICA branding is likely to be the main reason it costs more. There's a strong possibility that it will hold it's value more than the Fuji in the long term because of the Leica badge, but I do agree it's expensive.

I recently done a 'PRIME LENS BATTLE' on my blog comparing prices of lenses from 5 mirrorless camera brands across 3 focal lengths; 35mm, 50mm and 85-90mm equiv. FUJI came out the MOST EXPENSIVE, Samsung the cheapest.


If you're thinking about moving to Fuji it's worth looking at the total cost of the switch to see if it does in fact work out cheaper. That's assuming you're going to buy more than a body and 1 lens.

I would imagine it would cost you more than the $400 lens price difference to switch your whole system, but you may have already convinced yourself that you MUST HAVE that very tempting new Fuji camera and lens!!

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow