This shot is what convinced me to shoot in RAW (RX10)

Started Mar 1, 2014 | Discussions thread
SanPedro Regular Member • Posts: 162
Re: JPGs are better than most suppose...

Mazymus wrote:

aaanouel wrote:

RAW files are great because of having lots of info for processing and recovering, OK!, but beyond RAW lovers imagination, you can also do great jobs from JPGs, in fact I shot RAWs only in very special occasions.

Original JPEG

Processed JPEG

I'd probably get better results shooting in RAW but this is just enough for me and saving A LOT of memory space in my hard disks.

-- hide signature --

Truth is a pathless land.
The dead past darkens the ever living present.
Corrections and critics are more than very welcome, desirables.

Point well taken. Beautiful shot

File sizes are not THAT much different if you go for superfine... from my experience

My RAW files are 19.4Mb
JPEgs are 11-16.8Mb in superfine.

And just to note that you can recover more from an under exposed shot than you can from an over exposed shot. If the pixels are pure white there ain't a lot you can do.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow