DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Samsung vs Fuji

Started Feb 25, 2014 | Discussions thread
Ysarex
Ysarex Veteran Member • Posts: 3,354
Re: Samsung vs Fuji
2

viking79 wrote:

Ysarex wrote:

targut wrote:

It depends. If you prefer to shoot JPG only and rely on the in-camera conversion, then Fuji may be a better solution.

However, I would not recommend X-Trans to RAW shooters or those who spend a lot of time in post-processing.

Hmmm?? I'm a raw shooter and have really been enjoying my new Fuji X-E2 with X-Trans sensor. What am I doing that you wouldn't recommend?

Probably referring to early versions of demosaicing software. I don't mind new Lightroom/ACR with X-Trans, but the early versions were horrid.

Eric

The current (8.4) ACR/LR demosaicing for the X-Trans sensor isn't horrid, but it's still poor and I don't use it and wouldn't recommend it. But I stopped living in an Adobe-centric world years ago so it's fine with me if their software sucks.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow