Is there anything today that feels even marginally like an OM-2?

Started Feb 24, 2014 | Questions thread
D Cox Forum Pro • Posts: 21,582
Re: That's a personal question

Becksvart wrote:

darklamp wrote:

and more importantly perhaps the OM 2 doesn't need a 3,4cm adapter.

That would be because it's already 3.4cm thicker ( ignoring the small grip on end the NEX's ).

It's your perception of this that makes it an issue, not the fact of it.

It's about how a lens balances on a body. An adapter may help and it may not help. I dare say that for a tiny NEX and small lenses it does not, whilst an LA-EA2 does indeed help with bigger lenses.

You can however argue "It's subjective!" and make most of the internets redundant

I have never understood this talk of lenses "balancing".

If a lens is on the heavy side, then the lighter the camera the better, to keep down the weight you have to carry.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow