Spending more on glass, less on body - thoughts?

Started Feb 20, 2014 | Discussions thread
Vato915 Forum Member • Posts: 58
Re: Spending more on glass, less on body - thoughts?

EinsteinsGhost wrote:

Not sure where you get the idea that NEX-3N lacks in low light. Even te original (NEX-3) was quite good.

Yep.  My little 3N was able to do just fine... with the right lens!  

If I were in your position, I would pick NEX-3N. It is inexpensive for under 300 with the kit zoom. Then pickup a6000 body only and keep the lens. At that point, you could consider selling the 3N body only or simply keep it as a backup.

This is my plan.  Keeping my kit 16-50PZ, getting the A6000 body (keep the 3N as a backup -- for travel/selfies) and expand my lenses from there.

-- hide signature --
 Vato915's gear list:Vato915's gear list
Canon EOS M Sony Alpha NEX-3N Sony E 50mm F1.8 OSS Sony E 55-210mm F4.5-6.3 OSS Canon EF-M 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM +2 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow