Why is FE 70-200 bigger and heavier than Canon's

Started Feb 13, 2014 | Discussions thread
Steven-T Veteran Member • Posts: 3,394
Re: Why is FE 70-200 bigger and heavier than Canon's

EinsteinsGhost wrote:

pevece wrote:

hellocrowley wrote:

I had high hopes for the FE system, was thinking that I'd eventually switch from Fuji, but it seems the size and weight advantage are not there?

Filter Thread 72 mm
Dimensions (DxL) Approx. 3.15 x 6.89" (80 x 175 mm)
Weight 29.63 oz (840 g)

Canon 70-200/4 IS:
Filter Thread Front:67 mm
Dimensions (DxL) Approx. 3.0 x 6.8" (7.62 x 17.27 cm)
Weight 1.67 lb (760 g)

They should hire someone from Pentax to design the lenses.

use the canon version on a 36mp sensor and see what happens !

you want high quality , small in size, lightweight and cheap, sorry that's not feasible today

The centre of the Canon lens has been tested on 18MP APS-C, you'd need 46MP full frame to be as demanding. Its corners on 21MP full frame are not an issue. There are some A7R user using one with an adapter, ask them.


How much does the Canon weigh with the adapter? Dimensions added too?

You can carry one MB3 for all the EF lenses (mount the adapter on the camera A7/R), rather than adding an "adapter-tube" to each FE lens.  AF speed? Hmm . . .


 Steven-T's gear list:Steven-T's gear list
Leica M9 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Sony a7R II +6 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow