Is Iridient that good or Capture One that bad?

Started Feb 12, 2014 | Discussions thread
(unknown member) Contributing Member • Posts: 614
Re: Is Iridient that good or Capture One that bad?

Allan wrote:

stimpy wrote:

Majkes wrote:

I;ve been reasearching the raw post processing of fuji x files for a long time now, I want to be 100% sure I will get the best files possible when I will finally buy my XT1.

Of all the examples I;ve seen on the internet this one struck me the most

Is Iridient really that good iin comparision to others? C1 are supposed to be much better than LR and frankly, this image looks terrible.


That's certainly a big difference. Do you have the source of the image?

It's from here:

Don’t Sweat the Details but… – a non-scientific review of Iridient Developer

Thanks for that; there are a few other good examples but I agree this is the biggest difference I have seen yet between C1 and ID.

I think it's fair to want to see the best out of your camera and sometimes with these Fuji RAW files the difference between RAW processor output can be like a generation in sensor tech.

The good thing is that it shows what is possible.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow