On Foveon X3 Quattro...

Started Feb 10, 2014 | Discussions thread
robert1955 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,854
Re: Yes, it is a good model...

Raist3d wrote:

Iliah Borg wrote:

Raist3d wrote:

Iliah Borg wrote:

Sigma marketing clearly shows them as B/G/R

And that makes it a good model? Since when marketing tools are good models?

less resolution

No. Less pixel count.

chromatically less resolution spatially.

Prove it?

What is there to prove. You have 1/4th the resolution in two layers whose main job as it is emerging is be more sensitive to color. What exactly is missing from that- that seems pretty obvious to me. But you can also check what Dick said himself:

That is still within the marketing side. Sigma has never [afaik] talked in terms of the model I. Borg shows. At tthis point in time they will want to emphasize why the new approach is better [without disparraging the old one]. So for 'proof'you'll have to go outside their box

 robert1955's gear list:robert1955's gear list
Fujifilm X-E3 Fujifilm XF 16mm F1.4 R WR Fujifilm 50mm F2 R WR Samyang 12mm F2 NCS CS
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow