DOF and Cropping take 2

Started Feb 11, 2014 | Discussions thread
awaldram Forum Pro • Posts: 13,133
Re: So, your conclusion is that 'equivalency = false'?

moving_comfort wrote:


Really? Can you show me where James showed how equivalence proved me wrong?I think he'd be as suprised to hear that he did that as me

(I think you're attributing some of what he was writing incorrectly, by the way - but I'll let him speak for himself.)

I've found the root of your point = Lumo Labs LoL

So now we know why you can't prove it as falconeye says

"Proof of equivalence

Now, I would have to proof my claim above. I don't do, it would just obfuscate my point."

So he admits he doesn't prove his thesis because to do so would confuse his point.

i.e to do so would prove it wrong and at a guess he already has done but didn't like the answer preferring fallacy over fact.

As they say there’s one born every minute

I also like his reference to the luminous landscape article I referred to his conclusion it to complex !


-- hide signature --

Here are a few of my favorite things...

 awaldram's gear list:awaldram's gear list
Pentax K-x Pentax Q Olympus PEN E-PM2 Pentax Q7 Pentax K-3 +17 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow