DOF and Cropping take 2

Started Feb 11, 2014 | Discussions thread
moving_comfort Veteran Member • Posts: 8,228
Re: DOF and Cropping take 2

Gary Martin wrote:

This is just another, thinly-disguised full-frame vs. APS-C debate, amirite?

Not really, it's about equivalence, which describes a relationship between any two formats. It does happen to have more relevance to two different formats that may share he same mount, though, like aps-c & FF, because then it all of a sudden becomes less academic.

Incidentally it can also be used to show how aps-c can be a better choice than FF in some cases, if you want to use it to apply to practical examples; you find out what lenses can do what on each format, and then price out each in size and weight. aps-c 'wins' some of those battles, if you want to think of it in those terms. But you wouldn't know that if you didn't use equivalence

(The thread is also about cropping and DOF and display sizes, which is related but not the same subject really.)

And "Equivalence" is its new catch-phrase.

Only "new" to many in this particular forum. But if we see an FF body, it will be good to understand for any K-mount shooter who might want to use his/her lenses on both formats.

Here's one of the first outlines, very well done and originally from 2006 I think.  Of course it directly contradicts a few of the things awaldram is saying, so he's going to pretend it's crackpottish.


-- hide signature --

Here are a few of my favorite things...

 moving_comfort's gear list:moving_comfort's gear list
Pentax K20D Nikon D800 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm F1.8G Nikon AF-S Nikkor 300mm f/4D ED-IF Nikon AF Nikkor 20mm f/2.8D +10 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow