What would more MP mean to you ?

Started Feb 12, 2014 | Discussions thread
nixda Veteran Member • Posts: 5,515
Re: I want more

Les Lammers wrote:

nixda wrote:

As primarily a landscape shooter, I'd be very interested in higher pixel densities, as long as the IQ doesn't suffer.

I think the sweet spot for APS-C is 24 MP, not 16 MP.

All the 'disadvantages' you have listed will be made up for by improvements in the respective areas. For example, files get bigger, so do hard drives; it takes more time to write, but processors get faster, so it won't; existing lenses are good enough, for the most part, etc.

Maybe, maybe not. Personally. I'm thinking about a Sigma DP Merrill for landscape. Close to MF results for not a lot of $$$.

The Foveon sensors prove that higher pixel densities have clear advantages, if they could only keep up with IQ at higher ISO's, but when ETTR that becomes largely moot. So, yes, more MPs please

 nixda's gear list:nixda's gear list
Fujifilm X-E1 Fujifilm XF 14mm F2.8 R Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 +1 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow